Previous Page  26 / 76 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 76 Next Page
Page Background

July

2020

HYDROCARBON

ENGINEERING

24

option is best left to the user. For this reason, the

company’s primary focus is the development of improved

coating options.

Industry standard coating systems

Several years ago during a technical conference centred on

centrifugal compressor operation, Elliott Group asked

participants about the use of coatings to deal with fouling

issues. The responses were surprisingly polarised. In one

group were those who use coatings regularly, with and

without wash systems, believing that the cost is easily

offset by extended run times. In the other group were

those who prefer wash systems alone to deal with fouling

because they do not believe coatings work. A subset of the

second group included respondents who had a bad

experience with coatings. To address these negative views

on coatings, it makes sense to review the current state of

industry standard coatings and how they are used.

The technology for the current industry standard

coating systems was developed in the late 1980s. Original

coatings developed nearly 40 years ago are still the most

prevalent in the compressor industry, although there are

some more recent coatings that show significant

improvements in fouling resistance and durability, such as

Elliott’s Pos-E-Coat® Plus and Pos-E-Coat® 523. While there

are minor differences in the composition of the coatings

between suppliers, their descriptions and properties are

nearly identical.

These industry standard coatings are applied to

compressors in all services that cause fouling, yet the data

sheets, and virtually all of the (albeit limited) published

testing data on their fouling resistance, relates to

hydrocarbon fouling. This type of internally generated

fouling occurs when the process gas polymerises inside the

compressor and condenses polymeric materials on the flow

surfaces. Hydrocarbon fouling is extremely problematic,

and in some cases can be spectacular, as evidenced in

Figure 1 (top), where foulant with a tar-like consistency

oozes from the compressor.

Unfortunately, these same coatings are also used, with

little to no validation, in other services or conditions where

the foulant originates as carryover from upstream

processes. This type of foulant can be very different

relative to internally generated foulant. Figure 1 (bottom)

shows the build-up of chloride salts carried into a

hydrogen recycle compressor. Not only do these salts

restrict flow passages, they can also cause severe under

deposit corrosion even in stainless steel and nickel based

alloys.

This raises several questions. Firstly, are the current

industry standard coatings truly suitable for these

alternative applications, and is this possibly the root of

some of the negativity surrounding coatings? Secondly, in

an industry where every compressor is custom engineered

specifically for each installation, is a ‘one size fits all’

industry-standard coating, based on 40-year-old

technology, the solution to combat fouling?

Figure 1.

Examples of fouling caused by internal

polymerisation (top) and salt carryover (bottom).

Figure 2.

Results of the foulant adhesion test for Pos-E-Coat (left) and Coating 18 (right).