
There is also no doubt that the industry is under pressure,
and that new projects and developments will face
increasingly stringent environmental regulations. Despite
efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption, it still provides
for nearly 93% of Australia’s primary energy needs. The
country committed itself to reducing carbon emissions,
but the path toward reducing carbon intensity has been a
political battle. Australia must cut coal use if it is to meet
its goals, but recent years have stalled progress. The
country possesses massive coal reserves, and is the world’s
largest exporter of coal, with exports in 2018 valued at
US$47 billion. BP notes that the reserve-to-production
ratio for Australia’s coal is 304 years. However, a growing
number of Australians fear that they may not have a viable
country in 300 years if global climate change continues to
worsen.
On the downstream petroleum side, several Australian
refineries have already closed, and the remaining four still
have work to do. The industry lobbied for a
postponement to 2027 of the switch to 10 ppm maximum
sulfur gasoline, stating that a rapid move to this standard
could threaten their viability. The European Union moved
to Euro 5 standards in 2009, so Australia is lagging far
behind its European allies. Auto manufacturers have
criticised the oil industry, noting that the most advanced
and efficient engines require ultra-low sulfur fuel. The
Australian Institute of Petroleum was quick to point out
that each remaining refinery contributes approximately
AUS$1 billion per year to the local economy, and that over
AUS$2 billion has been invested in the refineries over the
past five years. They now have eight years to make the
investments needed to produce 10 ppm sulfur gasoline.
LNG is the brightest spot among the fossil fuels, since
so many importing countries rely on LNG as a means of
reducing carbon emission from coal and oil. By late 2018,
Australia was exporting more LNG than Qatar, and it
appears that Australia will be the world’s largest LNG
exporter this year. Australia is expanding its infrastructure
to increase natural gas use domestically as well.
Australia’s 2020 target was to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions 5% below 2000 levels. Early on, the Department
of the Environment and Energy stated that the country
would beat this target. But the carbon tax was enacted
and quickly repealed, and Australian CO
2
emission rose. BP
reports that year 2018 emissions were 16% above 2000
emissions, making its initial pledge nearly impossible to
achieve. In November 2016, Australia ratified the Paris
Agreement and the Doha Amendment to the Kyoto
Protocol. Under the Paris Agreement, Australia must
reduce emissions by 26 – 28% below 2005 levels by the
year 2030. Australia intends to cut per-capita emissions by
half, since its per-capita emissions are so far above most
OECD countries. But for the past few years, Australia has
been moving in the wrong direction, raising the question,
can Australia reduce its carbon intensity as pledged?
References
1. ‘Statistical Review of World Energy 2019’, BP, Group Chief
Economist’s analysis.
2. ‘Resources and Energy Quarterly’, Australian Department of
Industry, Innovation and Science, (March 2019).
YOU CAN IMPROVE YOUR
DECISION MAKING...
...WITH THE RIGHT
INFORMATION.
HOERBIGER‘s compressor audits
assess compressor performance
visualize improvement potential
anticipate savings
provide ROI for each scenario
estimate the value of the reliability increase
ree.hoerbiger.comVisit us @
TPS Booth 2813