Previous Page  34 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

August

2019

HYDROCARBON

ENGINEERING

32

bicine, the solvent had to be regularly reclaimed with an

ion exchange reclaiming unit. While HSS and bicine are

removed by ion-exchange, degradation products such as

DEA and MMEA are not removed by this method. DEA

and MMEA are known to be non-selective amines,

absorbing both H

2

S and CO

2

. After years of reclaiming,

significant amounts of these amines (5 wt% DEA and

2 wt% MMEA) have accumulated to the point of causing

a decline in CO

2

slip, resulting in an increase in energy

usage. The unit had to operate the reboiler at close to

the maximum steam rate in order to meet the treating

objectives.

A study was then undertaken to determine the impact

of switching from MDEA. FLEXSORB solution does not

degrade to form DEA and MMEA, and therefore H

2

S

selectivity performance would not decline over time.

Table 2 shows the results of the study and the capacity

that can be regained with a changeout. Other

improvements include reduced steam consumption,

reduced circulation rate, and lower levels of H

2

S in the tail

gas to the incinerator.

Case 2

In contrast to Case 1, a similar sized TGTU operated with

FLEXSORB SE for eight years. Analysis of the solvent

sample showed little heat stable salts accumulation over

time, and no accumulation of DEA and MMEA overtime.

The solvent in this TGTU was never replaced and required

no reclaiming during this eight year period. Solvent

makeup rate was low. Table 3 compares the performance

of the unit shortly after start-up in 2010 with performance

eight years later.

Case 3

A US Gulf Coast refinery TGTU had been operating with

MDEA solvent since initial start-up. The sulfur capacity was

limited by SO

2

emissions from the thermal oxidiser during

the summer months. This limitation required the renting of

chillers when using MDEA to lower the level

of H

2

S in the treated gas going to the

incinerator. The unit also had corrosion

problems in the reboiler shell and the

absorber tower, resulting in frequent

re-tubing of the reboiler and a replacement

of the tower shell. A study was undertaken

to quantify the incentives for a solvent

changeover with the goal of both reducing

operating costs and increasing reliability.

The study determined that a solvent

changeover would be justified based on the

increased H

2

S selectivity (or CO

2

slip) of

SE Plus over MDEA. Improved selectivity

results in less CO

2

recycled back to the front

of the Claus SRU thereby unloading the SRU,

creating additional capacity. The new solvent

would also achieve a lower H

2

S level in the

treated gas at the same lean amine

temperature as the MDEA. The changeover

resulted in energy savings due to the lower

circulation rate. Additional savings were

realised by eliminating the need for chillers during the

summer months, and lowered maintenance costs on heat

exchanger replacements.

Conclusions

MDEA and hindered amines such as FLEXSORB SE/SE Plus

are used in the TGTUs to improve the SRE and to lower

SO

2

emissions. Case studies show that hindered amines

provide greater capacity and lower energy usage than

MDEA. Over time, MDEA degraded to form other

components that negatively affected its performance,

increasing costs as reclaiming services were required. In

contrast, hindered amine exhibited good stability over

time, which sustained its long-term performance:

„

Lower solvent circulation rate resulting in lower energy

costs.

„

Smaller unit equipment sizes.

„

‘Drop-in’ TGTU debottlenecks possible with a solvent

changeover to hindered amines.

„

Lower life cycle costs.

„

Experience with large SRU/TGTU train sizes of over

1000 tpd.

The increased operational flexibility and reliability of

FLEXSORB SE over MDEA offsets the lower solvent

replacement costs for MDEA.

References

1. CHOW, T., D’HAENE, P., FLOWERS, J., HALON, G., KIMTANAS, C.,

NASASTO, E., SCHENDEL, R., and WONG, V., ‘Fundamentals of

Sulfur Recovery’, Laurance Reid Gas Conditioning Conference,

Norman, Oklahoma, US, 2011, (edited in 2015 by KELLER, A.,

GRIGSON, S., JENSEN, D., LARUE, K., and OYEDEJI, A.).

2. ‘Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines For Petroleum

Refining’, International Finance Corp. – World Bank Group,

https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/

IFC_External_Corporate_Site/Sustainability-At-IFC/Policies-

Standards/EHS-Guidelines

3. ‘Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines For Natural Gas

Processing’, International Finance Corp. – World Bank Group,

https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/

IFC_External_Corporate_Site/Sustainability-At-IFC/Policies-

Standards/EHS-Guidelines

Table 5.

Comparison of plant performance for solvent

changeover

Solvent

MDEA

FLEXSORB SE Plus

Acid gas feed rate to SRU

X

138% of X

Circulation rate

X

60% of X

H

2

S leak rate (vppm)

358

19

CO

2

slip (% of feed)

50

87

H

2

S in acid gas recycle (mol%)

23

71

Recycle gas rate to SRU

X

71% of X

Lean amine temperature (˚C)

34.3

36

Table 4.

Comparison of energy savings for solvent changeover

Solvent

MDEA

FLEXSORB SE Plus

Circulation rate

X

60% of X

Chiller rental in summer

Yes

No

Steam rate

X

79% of X

Steam costs

X

79% of X