Previous Page  31 / 100 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 31 / 100 Next Page
Page Background

HYDROCARBON

ENGINEERING

August

2019

29

A

n important aspect of the sulfur recovery/

amine-based tail gas treatment unit (TGTU) is to

maximise hydrogen sulfide absorption while

minimising carbon dioxide co-absorption.

Selective treating permits the full utilisation of the solvent

for hydrogen sulfide (H

2

S) removal by releasing the capacity

otherwise occupied by the carbon dioxide (CO

2

), thereby

reducing circulation rate and increasing efficiency. There are

currently two types of amine-based technologies used in

combination with sulfur recovery units:

methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) and sterically-hindered

amine such as FLEXSORB

TM

SE and SE Plus. This article will

present data to compare the stability and long-term

performance of both technologies in operating units.

Tail gas treatment and sulfur removal

efficiency

Over the past few decades, Claus type sulfur recovery

units (SRUs) have evolved to achieve increasingly greater

levels of sulfur recovery efficiencies (SRE), which have also

allowed facilities to meet lower sulfur dioxide (SO

2

)

emission targets. These improvements were partly made

possible by the introduction of solvent technologies

employed in the tail gas treatment section of the SRU.

Early Claus SRUs had no downstream technologies to

capture the remaining residual sulfur compounds exiting

the catalytic stages of the process. In a Claus SRU, H

2

S is

converted to elemental sulfur which can be used to make

fertilizers and other useful chemical compounds. Claus

SRUs typically convert 93 – 97% of the sulfur contained in

the feed streams to elemental sulfur.

1

TGTUs were later

added to SRUs to improve recovery and to reduce sulfur

emissions. Sulfur recovery and emissions are

interconnected in that sulfur that is not recovered in the

SRU is incinerated to form SO

2

. The acid gas from the

TGTU is recycled back to the SRU so that the overall SRE is

higher than what can be achieved with the SRU alone

(Figure 1).

Jenny Seagraves, ExxonMobil Chemical, USA, and

Robert B. Fedich, Essex Consulting, USA,

compare

amine-based tail gas treating technologies.