CONTACT INFO
MANAGING EDITOR
James Little
EDITOR
Rosalie Starling
EDITORIAL ASSISTANT
Francesca Brindle
ADVERTISEMENT DIRECTOR
Rod Hardy
ADVERTISEMENT MANAGER
Chris Atkin
ADVERTISEMENT EXECUTIVE
Will Powell
ADVERTISEMENT EXECUTIVE
David Ramsden
DIGITAL EDITORIAL ASSISTANT
Angharad Lock
PRODUCTION
Ben Munro
WEB MANAGER
Tom Fullerton
WEB EDITOR
Callum O’Reilly
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Laura White
CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
Nancy Yamaguchi Gordon Cope
SUBSCRIPTION RATES
Annual subscription £110 UK including
postage/£125 overseas (postage airmail).
Two year discounted rate £176 UK including
postage/£200 overseas (postage airmail).
SUBSCRIPTION CLAIMS
Claims for non receipt of issues must be made within 3 months
of publication of the issue or they will not be honoured without
charge.
APPLICABLE ONLY TO USA & CANADA
Hydrocarbon Engineering (ISSN No: 1468‑9340,
USPS No: 020‑998) is published monthly by Palladian
Publications Ltd GBR and distributed in the USA by Asendia
USA, 17B S Middlesex Ave, Monroe NJ 08831. Periodicals
postage paid New Brunswick, NJ and additional mailing offices.
POSTMASTER: send address changes to HYDROCARBON
ENGINEERING, 701C Ashland Ave, Folcroft PA 19032.
15 South Street Farnham Surrey
GU97QU ENGLAND
Tel: +44 (0) 1252 718 999
Fax: +44 (0) 1252 718 992
COMMENT
T
he last two years have proved to be a testing time
for the oil industry. The infamous price crash turned
the global economy on its head, and cost operators
billions in lost profits. The sector has faced substantial
investment cuts and considerable layoffs, and experts around the
globe have highlighted the potential risk to oil supplies – by no
means an encouraging sign for the future of the industry, and our
predominant source of energy.
Fed up of the continually languishing prices and climate of distinct uncertainty, in mid‑summer, a
number of Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) members called for a meeting
to discuss measures to stabilise the market. While the industry remained somewhat sceptical about
the gathering, plans went ahead and on 28 September, member countries convened in Algiers for
the 170
th
(Extraordinary) Meeting of the OPEC Conference. The result? Several significant conclusions
were endorsed – the most critical being that OPEC must not ignore the potential risk that the present
stock overhang may continue to weigh negatively into the future, impacting producers, consumers
and the industry alike.
Member countries have agreed to conduct a constructive dialogue with non‑member producing
countries in an attempt to stabilise the market and avoid any adverse impacts in the short and
medium term – continuous collaborative efforts among producers, both within and outside of
OPEC, were highlighted as a key factor that would help restore market balance and sustainability.
Furthermore, the challenge of reducing excess stock levels over the coming quarters was addressed,
and members noted the drop in US oil inventories seen in the weeks running up to the meeting.
This is a big step for the industry – the last time OPEC agreed in principle to production cuts
was during the financial crisis in 2008 – with members deciding on an OPEC‑14 production target
ranging between 32.5 and 33 million bpd in order to accelerate stock reduction efforts. While
OPEC hasn’t actually implemented the cuts yet, and many of the details need to be worked out,
a High Level Committee has been allocated to study the implementation of production levels
and develop a framework of consultations between OPEC and non‑OPEC oil producing countries,
including the identification of risks and formation of proactive measures. These (as well as targets for
each country) are due to be decided at the next OPEC meeting on 30 November in Vienna.
So, while all of this looks quite promising, on 23 October, Iraq's Oil Minister Jabar Ali al‑Luaibi
threw a rather large spanner in the works, informing reporters in a briefing that the country should be
exempt from output restrictions due to the funding required to fight the war against the Islamic State.
Falah al‑Amiri, Director General of the State Oil Marketing Organisation (SOMO), further noted that
Iraq's market share was compromised by the various wars it has fought since the 1980s, adding that the
country "should be producing 9 million [bpd] if it wasn't for the wars."
1
Oil prices dipped on 24 October following the announcement, with Reuters reporting a 0.6%
drop in Brent crude to US$51.46/bbl (down US$0.32) and a 0.7% fall in US West Texas Intermediate
(WTI) crude to US$50.52/bbl (down US$0.33).
2
While things are still very uncertain for the global oil markets, according to analysts, OPEC's
upcoming meeting may signal a rebalancing in terms of production and consumption. "A decision
to cut to 33 million bpd should keep the crude price basis (Brent) in the US$50 ‑ 60 band, not least
because it shows that Saudi policy has changed, that OPEC is serious and can rise above political
disagreements," noted David Hufton, PVM.
3
One thing's for sure: all eyes will be on Vienna in
November when these crucial decisions will be hashed out by some of the industry's foremost figures.
References
1. ‘Iraq says should be exempted from OPEC output freeze’, Reuters,
-
minister-idUSKCN12N0C4.
2. ‘Oil dips on Buzzard restart, Iraq; US crude tests below $50’, Reuters,
-
idUSKCN12O02S.
3. ‘US crude settles down 33 cents at $50.52 after Iraq resists joining output cut’, CNBC,
/
2016/10/23/oil-prices-drop-as-iraq-says-doesnt-want-to-join-opec-cut.html.
ROSALIE STARLING,
EDITOR
